INJUSTICE IN NIGERIA ELECTORAL SYSTEM: AN APPRAISAL OF JOHN RAWLS’S THEORY OF JUSTICE.

Nigeria's electoral process has been affected with charges of injustice for many years, and undermine fairness, transparency, and electoral legitimacy. This study conducts a philosophical analysis of such injustices in the context of John Rawls' theory of justice. Rawls' equality, impartiality, and "veil of ignorance" provide a main ground for condemning Nigeria's voting practice in voter intimidation, election violence, and so many corruption. In the context of Nigeria, Rawls’ theory provides a balanced foundation to critique elections that marginalize ordinary voters and privilege the political class. By a detailed observation of the lack of the election process in accordance with Rawlsian justice, this present research aims to reveal the political and ethical aspects of vote-rigging and other democratic deficits. The focus is not only on diagnosing the flaws of the system, but on proposing restorative measures that go beyond justice to structural reorientation towards fairness and equity. This also gives a reason for potential reform based on the doctrine of Rawls and demands a fair and equitable election process freedom, That is why the elections are devoid of justice. The study describes a justice-neutral framework that upholds fairness approaches that ensures equality, openness, and responsible governance. Through critical and philosophical analysis, the present study adds to the broader debate on democratic ethics and electoral integrity in Nigeria.The focus is to respond to the gaps by providing frameworks and concrete actions that strengthen equality, fairness and democracy within the society.