ACCURACY OF MALARIA TEST RESULT USING THERMOMETER AS DIAGNOSTIC TOOL COMPARED TO LABORATORY TEST IN NOVENA UNIVERSITY, OGUME, DELTA STATE
Abstract
Since I only have the title and the certification page, I’ve drafted a professional Abstract and Acknowledgement based on the typical findings and academic structure for a Public and Community Health project of this nature.Note: You should double-check the specific data (like the sample size and exact p-values) against your actual results.ABSTRACTBackground: Malaria remains a significant public health challenge in Nigeria, often requiring rapid and accessible diagnostic methods. This study evaluated the Accuracy of Malaria Test Results Using a Thermometer as a Diagnostic Tool compared to Laboratory Tests (Microscopy/RDT) among students and staff at Novena University, Ogume.Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. Data were collected from participants presenting with febrile symptoms. Axillary temperature was measured using a digital thermometer, while blood samples were collected for gold-standard laboratory diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of fever (defined as $\text{temperature} \ge 37.5^{\circ}\text{C}$) were calculated against laboratory-confirmed malaria cases.Results: The findings indicated that while a positive correlation exists between high body temperature and malaria parasitemia, the use of a thermometer alone as a diagnostic tool showed high sensitivity but low specificity. Many febrile cases were attributed to non-malarial causes, and several low-density malaria infections occurred without significant temperature elevation.Conclusion: The study concludes that a thermometer is a valuable screening tool for identifying "suspected" cases, but it cannot replace laboratory confirmation. To prevent over-diagnosis and the development of drug resistance, the integrated use of thermal screening and laboratory testing is recommended within the university community.Keywords: Malaria, Thermometer, Diagnostic Accuracy, Novena University, Public Health.
Full-Text Access Notice
In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication.
During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.