AN APPRAISAL OF THE EXERCISE OF DISCRETION WITHIN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS FROM ARREST TO SENTENCING IN NIGERIA

Student: Bibobra Brian Tabai
Supervisor: Miss Emike Jessica Imuekemhe
HOD: Dr Effiong Esu
Department of Law
Law
Baze University, Abuja, Fct

Abstract

The exercise of discretion within the criminal justice process in Nigeria plays a crucial role in ensuring the fair and just administration of the law, from arrest to sentencing. This abstract explores how discretion is exercised by various stakeholders, including law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and judges, at different stages of the criminal justice process. It delves into the legal and institutional framework guiding discretion, its benefits in allowing for flexibility and individualized justice, and the potential pitfalls, such as the risk of bias, corruption, and inconsistent application of the law. The appraisal examines how discretion can be both a tool for achieving justice and a source of injustice, depending on how it is applied. It also considers reforms aimed at mitigating the negative impacts of discretion while enhancing its positive contributions to the criminal justice system in Nigeria. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study seeks to provide insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with the exercise of discretion within the criminal justice process in Nigeria, from arrest to sentencing, offering recommendations for improving the balance between fairness and justice.

Full-Text Access Notice

In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication. During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.

Request authorisation from the author