THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SELECTED CYBER THREAT INTELLIGENCE SHARING PLATFORMS
Abstract
Cyber threat intelligence has become increasingly present in corporate security systems as it has
great importance in mitigating threats and, consequently, reducing damage from attacks. Several
efforts have been conducted in Cyber Security field within the past years on Threat Intelligence
Platforms. From the practical perspective, the last years were shaped by growth regarding the
implementation of threat intelligence platforms, the used indicators (e.g., hash values, TTPs), and
the number of TI sources available. As the field settles into its new maturity, understanding and
improving the effectiveness of CTI programs will become even more critical. Until now, several
TISPs have been identified, analyzed and a classification framework has been developed. What is
still lacking is a broad-based examination of existing TISPs using a comparative and broadly
applicable literature review. Comparatives Analyses will be conducted on some selected TISPs
based on User feedback, platforms reliability, community support, Ease to use and License model,
Performance matrix, durability, number of active users. SWOT (Strengths, Weakness,
Opportunities, threats) analysis for each platform and Ethical Considerations. The methodology
contains the approach proposed to evaluate CTI standards and platforms is described. First, a
method is developed to restrict and define which standards and platforms will be analyzed and
evaluate. Then, the predefined criteria for evaluation, SWOT analysis, and features comparison
matrix are explained. The selected Threat Intelligence Sharing platforms listed are evaluate based
on their popularity and license model among the user in the cybersecurity ecosystem. Considering
the results obtained with the literature research, complemented with the review of the official web
sites and documentation of most standards, the standards were ranked in terms of popularity and
license model results are presented. The selected TISPs comparative analysis on features
comparison matrix which include Platform type, Threat intelligence sharing, Data formats
supported, Community driven intelligence, Advanced Analytics, Incident response integration,
Integration with SIEMS/other Tools, Malware, Cloud-based, Endpoint protection integration,
Scalability, Customization and Cost. These features analysis will give an organization the insights
of the platform suitable for the organization which also depends on factors such as the
organization’s size, budget, and the specific needs of its security infrastructure. Larger enterprises
may benefit from the advanced capabilities of ThreatConnect, IBM X-Force Exchange, or Cisco
TID, while smaller organizations might opt for open-source solutions like MISP or AlienVault
OTX. For quick, simple analysis, VirusTotal is a strong option, especially for small-scale use
Full-Text Access Notice
In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication.
During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.