COOPERATIVE ACT OF INTERROGATION OF POLICE SUSPECT INTERACTION
Abstract
This study investigates the cooperative act of interrogation in police–suspect interactions, focusing on the communicative strategies employed during questioning sessions. It examines how cooperation, rapport-building, and structured dialogue influence the effectiveness of interrogations compared to coercive or adversarial approaches. Using qualitative analysis of selected case studies and interviews with law enforcement officers, the research highlights that cooperative interrogation fosters trust, reduces resistance, and enhances the accuracy of information obtained. Findings reveal that suspects are more likely to provide truthful responses when interrogators employ empathy, active listening, and non-threatening questioning techniques. The study concludes that cooperative interrogation not only improves investigative outcomes but also strengthens ethical policing practices and community trust in law enforcement. Recommendations include training officers in modern interrogation psychology, adopting standardized cooperative frameworks, and ensuring legal safeguards to protect suspects’ rights.
Full-Text Access Notice
In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication.
During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.