THE CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF ETHICAL CONCERNS ON EUTHANASIA AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE
Abstract
This study delves into the ethical labyrinth surrounding euthanasia, particularly its intricate relationship with the fundamental right to life. The research excavates the complex legal and philosophical battleground upon which this contentious issue is waged. This investigation employed a doctrinal legal research methodology, akin to meticulously sifting through the strata of legal sources. This entailed a rigorous analysis of primary sources such as legislation and case law, alongside the rich veins of scholarly discourse unearthed in academic literature. Through this process, the research aimed to illuminate the current legal framework and the multifaceted ethical debates that swirl around euthanasia. The paramount objective was to subject the ethical arguments, both for and against euthanasia, to a rigorous critique. This involved dissecting the concept of patient autonomy within the crucible of the right to life. Furthermore, the research sought to identify potential legal and practical fissures that could erupt with the legalization of euthanasia. Despite the burgeoning international discourse on the legalization of euthanasia, the ethical and legal terrain remains a shifting sandscape. This research endeavored to bridge this chasm by providing a laser-focused analysis confined within the specific jurisdiction of the Nigerian legal framework. The study meticulously scrutinized the ethical arguments from both sides of the divide, delving into the inherent tension that exists between patient autonomy and the sacrosanct nature of life. Additionally, the research unearthed potential legal and practical challenges that would necessitate resolution if euthanasia were to be legalized within the chosen jurisdiction. This study culminates by offering a nuanced perspective on the ethical maelstrom surrounding euthanasia and the right to life. The research underscores the criticality of fostering ongoing dialogue and pursuing legal reform efforts. This ongoing pursuit strives to strike a delicate balance between individual autonomy and societal anxieties, all within the specific legal confines of the Nigerian jurisdiction.
Full-Text Access Notice
In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication.
During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.