COMPARING THE STRENGTH OF BLOCKS MADE FROM LATERITE SOIL AND BLOCKS MADE FROM CEMENT

This study focused on evaluating the performance and viability of laterite soil blocks compared to cement blocks in construction. A quantitative survey research design was adopted to systematically collect and analyze data related to the compressive strength, durability, and cost-effectiveness of these building materials. A structured questionnaire was meticulously designed and distributed to a sample of 120 respondents, who provided insights into the comparative properties of laterite soil and cement blocks. The data collected were analyzed using frequency tables and simple percentages to present a clear picture of the respondents' perceptions and experiences. To test the hypotheses formulated for the study, a t-test was employed, allowing for a rigorous assessment of differences between laterite soil blocks and cement blocks. The findings revealed several key insights. The analysis demonstrated a significant difference in compressive strength between laterite soil blocks and cement blocks, with cement blocks showing superior strength. The results also indicated that cement blocks exhibited greater durability compared to laterite soil blocks when subjected to extreme weather conditions. Despite these differences, laterite soil blocks were found to be comparable to cement blocks in terms of durability under varying environmental conditions. Additionally, the study uncovered that cement blocks were perceived as more cost-effective and practical compared to laterite soil blocks, which might affect their adoption in construction projects. In conclusion, the study highlighted the strengths and limitations of using laterite soil blocks versus cement blocks. While cement blocks outperformed laterite soil blocks in strength and durability, the latter still showed potential in specific applications and conditions. The recommendations include encouraging further research to explore the long-term performance of laterite soil blocks, increasing awareness and training on the benefits and limitations of both materials, and considering regional factors in material selection for construction. Additionally, promoting the use of sustainable practices and materials in construction could lead to more environmentally friendly and cost-effective building solutions.