THE IMPACT OF ELECTORAL MALPRACTICE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF POLITICAL OFFICE HOLDERS

Abstract Electoral malpractice has remained a major threat to democratic consolidation in Nigeria, particularly affecting the legitimacy and performance of political office holders. This study investigates how electoral irregularities influence governance outcomes in Osun State. Guided by four research questions, the study explores the extent to which electoral malpractice undermines the legitimacy of political leaders, promotes corruption and political instability, and erodes public trust in governance. The core objectives include assessing the link between electoral fraud and poor governance, identifying manifestations of malpractice, and recommending actionable reforms. The study employed a descriptive survey design, utilizing structured questionnaires administered to 100 randomly selected respondents from Osun State. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with findings interpreted using mean scores and standard deviation. The research was anchored on three theoretical frameworks: Institutional Theory, Marxist Theory of the State, and Ethical Theory of Androx Fox. Findings revealed that electoral malpractice significantly affects the credibility and effectiveness of elected leaders. Vote-buying, result manipulation, and political violence were commonly reported, contributing to declining service delivery, corruption, and public apathy. Moreover, leaders emerging from fraudulent elections often prioritize patronage over public service, resulting in governance failure and diminished citizen trust. The study concludes that without electoral integrity, democratic governance in Nigeria remains weak. It recommends robust electoral reforms, enhanced civic education, and adoption of technology in elections. These measures are essential to curb malpractice, restore public confidence, and ensure that political office holders are truly accountable to the people they serve.